翻訳と辞書
Words near each other
・ Seketo'a
・ Sekeřice
・ Sekgoma II
・ Sekh Sahonawez
・ Sekha
・ Sekham
・ Sekhamir Kalay
・ Sekhar Basu
・ Sekhar Bhattacharya
・ Sekhar Chandra
・ Sekhar Das
・ Sekhar Kammula
・ Sekhar Menon
・ Sekhar Tam Tam
・ Sekhar V. Joseph
Sekhar v. United States
・ Sekhareswar Temple
・ Sekhari (architecture)
・ Sekhat
・ Sekhauliya, Uttar Pradesh
・ Sekhem scepter
・ Sekhemib-Perenmaat
・ Sekhemkare
・ Sekhemkare (Vizier)
・ Sekhemkhet
・ Sekhemre Khutawy Sobekhotep
・ Sekhemre Shedwast
・ Sekhemre-Heruhirmaat Intef
・ Sekhemre-Wepmaat Intef
・ Sekhemrekhutawy


Dictionary Lists
翻訳と辞書 辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ]
スポンサード リンク

Sekhar v. United States : ウィキペディア英語版
Sekhar v. United States

''Sekhar v. United States'' is a 2013 United States Supreme Court decision regarding extortion under the Hobbs Act of 1946.
==Details==
Giridhar C. Sekhar was a partner at a venture capital firm based in Brookline, Mass. In 2009, Sekhar sent multiple emails to Luke Bierman, who was at the time legal counsel to New York State Comptroller Thomas DiNapoli. According to the emails obtained from Sekhar's home computer by the FBI, Sekhar demanded that Bierman advise the comptroller to commit to a $35 million retirement fund investment at Sekhar's firm, threatening to reveal details of Bierman's alleged extra-marital affair to his wife, DiNapoli, and the media.
After initially being charged with coercion under state law, Sekhar was tried and convicted for attempted extortion under the federal Hobbs act. Sekhar's lawyers contended that the advice of a lawyer employed by the state was not a form of property that could be sought by threats, and hence that the extortion charge was not applicable in this case. The argument was refuted by a federal district court judge and by the Second Circuit court on appeal. Sekhar's lawyers then approached the United States Supreme Court in September 2012.
Justice Antonin Scalia wrote for the majority. The Court held that legal advice could not be considered to be "transferable property" and therefore did not fit the definition of extortion under the Hobbs Act. In September, 2013, Giridhar Sekhar files a pro-se motion to vacate his sentence.

抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)
ウィキペディアで「Sekhar v. United States」の詳細全文を読む



スポンサード リンク
翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース

Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.